A recent Indiana statute prohibits most registered sex offenders from using social networking websites, instant messaging services, and chat programs. John Doe, on behalf of a class of similarly situated sex offenders, challenges this law on First Amendment grounds. We reverse the district court and hold that the law as drafted is unconstitutional. Though content neutral, we conclude that the Indiana law is not narrowly tailored to serve the state’s interest. It broadly prohibits substantial protected speech rather than specifically targeting the evil of improper communications to minors. * * * Court Decision: John Doe -v- Prosecutor, Marion County
Related posts
-
Meta cracks down on teen “sextortion” on Facebook, Instagram
Source: arstechnica.com 11/21/22 Teens will finally have a way to proactively stop the spread of intimate... -
FBI finds sharp rise in online extortion of teens tricked into sending sexually explicit photos
Source: pbs.org 12/19/22 WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI sounded the alarm Monday about an explosive increase... -
NE: Dodge County sex offenders face challenges in registering
Source: fremonttribune.com 12/20/22 Convicted sex offenders in Fremont and Dodge County are required to register with...

Outstanding!
You know something.
America might actually get back on track if the Constitution was actually followed. It has been abused for so long that it might not seem possible but it really is the only thing that makes America different from any other country.
now if we can get facebook to change their policy on that !
Good point nicholas…also the discrimination by casebook..whatever ..
is blatant and glaring …they might as well said Jews blacks Arabs
Indians and so on when they group discrimination …its still wrong.